Here’s a question for the next BBC journalist you hear interviewing a Muslim, or any traitorous Liberal Democrat like Menzies Campbell, who criticise Britain’s foreign policy.

BBC reporters always let critics rant on about how Britain and America shouldn’t be in Iraq. About how outrageous our foreign policy is and how it should be stopped. But the BBC never asks this question. Why are you against the freedom lovers in Iraq? Why do you support the murderers and the uncivilised in Iraq?

There are two, perhaps three sides fighting in the conflict in Iraq.

There are the brave freedom loving Iraqis who want a liberal democracy like us with free speech, the rule of law, education for women, and the chance to improve their standard of living above the mud-hut level.

Then there are the two warring Islamic factions, both with a differing “culture” unchanged from the Dark Ages (and indistinguishable to me as to intent and quality), who are merciless, barbaric, use unspeakable and cowardly suicide bombers to randomly kill the innocent, while being duped into believing they will attain heaven and 72 white raisins for themselves and their families. These are Muslims killing other Muslims, as well as our soldiers.

Don’t forget also that the freedom loving Iraqis have this chance courtesy of U.S. and British action, which deposed the hated cold-blooded murder Saddam Hussein.

Just what is wrong with this foreign policy?

Who would the Muslim Council of Great Britain, or a hand-wringing Liberal Democrat, have us support? If they don’t support Britain and America, which of the other two loathsome factions should we support? Or do these critics really feel that citizens of the Middle East are just too stupid to handle liberal democracy, and would rather live in poverty and be ordered about like cattle as in traditional dictatorships like Iran and Syria?

Come on BBC, ask a serious question.

Brave Brown’s First Change – Don’t Say Muslim And Terrorist
“10 Inches Of Fat Cleavage” 

Was there ever a more risible speech on the steps of 10 Downing Street than Gordon Brown’s opening remarks as Prime Minister when he said “And now let the work of change begin”?

This man has been in joint charge of us for 10 years, yet he tried to pretend that he was somehow a newcomer whose fingerprints weren’t all over the Labour party’s incompetence and arrogance which has given us crumbling health, education and transport, the wipe out of our pensions, and more tax than you could shake a stick at.

His attempt to sound statesmanlike in the face of Islamic terror was ludicrous and feeble. His most important idea of change was the craven idea to stop calling Muslim terrorists Muslims or terrorists.

New Home Secretary Jacqui Smith (Jacqui who?), was clearly out of her depth, although the media mob all decided to take the same line, that her first performance in Parliament was somehow brave and impressive. She decided to wear a low cut dress in Parliament showing off her more than ample bosom. What on earth prompted her to do that? What kind of class-free zone is she? Did she think that might take our minds of the limp drivel she was spouting? I’m ashamed to admit it, but I was reminded of a remark a couple of years ago from Germaine Greer, who worked herself into a rage about journalistic rival Suzanne Moore displaying “10 inches of fat cleavage”.

BBC Sees Hamas Coup, Others See Murderous Corruption
Will Johnson See The Error Of His Ways?

It is great news that BBC journalist Alan Johntson has been freed, but how predictable that the BBC would peddle the line that somehow this was a publicity coup for the murderers and Medievalists from Hamas.

There is nothing short of a mea culpa and mass laying down of arms, which would allow this rotten regime in Gaza, ridden by warring families controlling little bits of territory with all the sophistication of modern day Al Capones, that could generate a publicity coup. We’ve seen Hamas murdering in cold blood. We know what they’re like. Only Hamas could make the loathsome Fatah organisation look good, momentarily.

It always struck me as ironic that Johntson, a biased and relentless supporter of the childish, professional victims wallowing in their own poverty, determined to stay poor, and seeking a Palestinian state, should have been put in danger by the people he so blindly supported.

Can we expect some kind of recantation in the next days? 

Only The NHS Could Have Saved These Lives  
“It is an ill wind that blows nobody any good”, the old proverb says, but who could have predicted this bit of National Health incompetence paying off in such a fantastic, serendipitous way?

If we had acknowledged the futility of state-controlled health care years ago, if we had dumped this infantile notion that health provision should be “fair”, whatever that is, rather than simply delivered in the best, most cost-efficient and economic way, then the syringes used by the alleged Islamic car bombers in London would have worked, and scores of innocents would have been killed and maimed.

But the syringes allegedly stolen by the alleged Muslim health service doctors failed to detonate the bombs. If the bombs had been prepared in France, Germany or the United States, the syringes would have certainly worked.

I never realised that there might be big, life saving benefits from having a third world health service.

Thank you, Aneurin Bevan. Thank you, new-Labour.

 Neil Winton – July 10, 2007